A leading digital platform to offer engaging shopping experience to users
A mobile app to digitalise & expand KFC’s digital footprint
The MIT Innovation award-winning app withh $52 million funding reshaping the employment lanscape.
A transforming ERP solution for the world’s largest furniture retailer
A refined UX strategy for Domino's to increase their conversion rate by 23%
A SaaS-based financial literacy and smart money management platform for kids
Hiring Fintech Software Developers – A Step-by-Step Process and Costs
How AI in Stock Trading will Transform Markets
How AI is Proving as a Game Changer in Manufacturing – Use Cases and Examples
How data mining helps in business intelligence
Why your enterprise business needs an IT strategy
What entrepreneurs need to know about Conversational AI
Healthcare App Development Guide – Use Cases, Costs, Trends & More
The Ultimate iOS App Development Guide for Business
The Definitive Guide to Flutter App Development
The Definitive Guide to Enterprise Digital Transformation
The Ultimate Guide to Software Development
Cloud Computing – An Ultimate Guide for Businesses
Appinventiv Wins Deloitte Fast 50 India 2023 Award
Clutch Names Appinventiv The Top Fintech App Development Agency
Appinventiv Ranked Top 2 in the List of Most Promising Mobile Application Solution Providers – 2018 by CIO Review
ShifaCare Wins ‘Top 50 Healthcare Companies’ Award at IFAH Dubai
Clutch Names Appinventiv a Top Mobile Development Agency for Startups
Appinventiv Named ‘The Top App Developer’ by Clutch
Wireframes and How they Affect the Mobile App Development Industry
From M to O – A Comparison Between Android’s Three Most Prevalent Operating Systems
New Update iOS 13.1.3 Is Out Now With Previous Bugs Squashed
11 Mobile App Trends that will Dominate 2018
How Much Does It Cost To Develop An App Like TaskRabbit?
How We Solve the Digital Transformation Challenges Pulling Your Business Down
If you had to make a list of top programming languages that appeared in the industry in the past decade, the two names that would emerge would be Go and Rust.
And, if you had to sit down and think of the programming languages which were best aligned with the motive to develop secure, microservice favoring frameworks and apps, you would again find yourself staring at the two languages.
Even after being similar in some prominent ways like maturity, being open source, and being designed for microservice oriented, modern, parallel computing environments, there is a lot of confusion around Go vs Rust and which of the two languages are good for the developer community to enter into.
The intent of this article today is to look into the difference between Go and Rust in much detail. The differences that go beyond Rust use cases and Golang use cases.
Let us answer Which is better: Rust or Go?
But before that, let us refresh the basics of both the programming languages.
Rust language came into existence back in 2010. Deemed as one of the ML languages’ extensions, the aim that the language was expected to fulfill was better security, performance, improved parallelism, and greater modularity.
The feature set that Rust comes with has brought it to a stage where there are very few developers who haven’t heard of it or as showing an unwillingness to work in it.
Go coding language was introduced back in 2007 by Google. It was looked at as a language that had emerged to solve the issues that organizations face when developing software infrastructure. The Go language specification was devised to introduce garbage collection, dependency management, built-in concurrency, robustness across multiple boundaries between the components, etc.
The result of the well thought of features of Go has gotten it a market position which is enough to bring it several points ahead in the Go vs Rust debate.
Now that we have looked into the basics of both the languages, let us get on to the part where we look into how they stack up against each other.
The one factor that weighs up Rust in the Rust vs Go debate is performance. The programs have been designed to run at similar or near similar speed of C++ and C.
Go, on the other hand, trade runtime speed for convenience, by making tasks automatic. But in terms of Rust vs Go Performance comparison, development speed of Go falls several steps behind the high performance that Rust offers.
Rust make use of compile time ownership strategy for memory management through zero cost abstractions. If a Rust program is not memory safe, it won’t be able to cross the compilation stage.
Like Rust, Go is also memory safe. But in the case of Go, it is handled automatically during the runtime. Meaning, developers won’t have to think of releasing or allocating memory when writing code.
At times, the development speed becomes more important than the program speed. A working example of this can be seen in the case of Python, which is not one of the fastest languages to run but fastest to write a software in.
Go comes with the same appeal. The simplicity and directness that it offers makes it faster than a number of languages in the market.
Rust, on the other hand, comes with more language features and thus takes longer to master. Its compile speed is also longer than Go’s. So, if the intent is of faster development cycle, you would be better off with Go than Rust.
Modern day apps are distributed and networked. The languages that haven’t planned for these realities are far off behind the curve. The developers have to be able to run the tasks independently and share state between the tasks minus the risk of data corruption.
Now while concurrency was built into Golang’s syntax from beginning, Rust recently gained the native syntax in the form of async/.await. But even though the concurrency of Rust lacks the developer experience that went behind Go, it makes up for it through Rust’s memory safety.
We could keep digging into both the languages, dissecting both sides of Go vs Rust comparison, but the ultimate answer to the Rust and Go comparison would be the fact that it depends. There are instances where Rust is better than Go and vice versa.
Ultimately, this is what we recommend as an app development company, who works on both –
The answer to this would be in when and not why. You should go with Golang when – you have to write code faster, when simplicity is a bit more important than performance, and when readability is a must have necessity.
There are some prevalent similarities between Go web development and Rust, mostly in terms of the maturity and the fact that both: the programming features of Rust and Go are open source and have been designed for microservice oriented, modern, parallel computing environments.
Yes. Speed is one of the biggest differences between Go and Rust – a difference which is won by Go.
B-25, Sector 58,
Noida- 201301,
Delhi - NCR, India
Suite 3810, Bankers Hall West,
888 - 3rd Street Sw
Calgary Alberta
1600+ transformation engineers delivered
3000+ game-changing products.
We chose Appinventiv to build our financial literacy and money management app from start to finish. From the first call, we were very impressed with Appinventiv’s professionalism, expertise, and commitment to delivering top-notch results.
It has been a pleasure working with Appinventiv. The team is not only extremely versatile and competent but also very professional, courteous, and responsive. We certainly plan to continue working with Appinventiv for an indefinite period.
We took a big leap of faith with Appinventiv who helped us translate our vision into reality with the perfectly comprehensive Edamama eCommerce solution. We are counting to get Edamama to launch on time and within budget, while rolling out the next phase of the platform with Appinventiv.
I just want to take a moment to thank the entire Appinventiv team for your incredible support. We truly appreciate everything you've done, and we're excited to continue working together as we grow here at KODA
After researching numerous companies, we finally found Appinventiv, and it was the best decision we could have made. They successfully addressed the challenges with our existing app and provided solutions that exceeded our expectations.
We approached Appinventiv with a clear vision to build a robust and future-ready platform that could seamlessly integrate with the busy lifestyle of our customers while uplifting their overall experience and giving us a competitive edge.
1600+ transformation engineers delivered
3000+ game-changing products.
Connect with our consultation experts to get:
Insights specific to your business needs
Roadmap to overcome your challenges
Opportunities to scale your business in this niche.